• Research Professorship

Public Social Sciences and Humanities: Key Societal Debates

Critical analysis and contextualisation of contemporary key societal debates about pressing social and environmental issues are the core concern of this professorship. Bridging the social sciences and the humanities, it analyses cultural, socio-political, and environmental phenomena and centres major fault lines of public conflicts. The professorship pursues a dual public orientation by responding to public debates and communicating with a wider audience beyond academia.

News & Highlights

Research Profile

The research professorship bridges the broad spectrums of the social sciences and the humanities, applying rigorous speculative thinking approaches to the analysis of cultural, socio-political, and environmental phenomena and data. It foregrounds the roles of imaginative writing, cultural arts, and media technology in fostering rational debates and cross-disciplinary, public-facing communication. The aim of the professorship is to centre major fault lines of public conflicts about pressing social and environmental issues in such a manner that the public can benefit from research insights, while the academy receives fruitful feedback. 

The professorship intends to establish new spaces for debates that accommodate diverse voices, views, and narratives. It seeks to bring on board marginalised positions and repressed knowledge systems. The underlying vision is that of a planet in balance where different systems and epistemologies co-exist on an equal footing and are able to communicate and interact. This also involves recognising the ways in which heterogenous knowledge shapes human and non-human communities. 

To achieve these goals, the professorship has the following three inter-related research focus areas.

Focus Areas

The central question this focus area seeks to answer is: In what ways might repressed traditional practices, systems, and worldviews of indigenous societies in the Global South, most of them formerly colonised, help us ‘repair’ our relationship with our earth? Working with literary and media data, the aim is to provide a pluriversal terrain of diverse ecological knowledges and practices that might complement universally accepted techno-scientific methodologies as the world grapples with socio-ecological crises.

When cross-border mobilities are discussed in relation to the environment, attention has mostly focused on the ways in which ecological crises have propelled the movement of people. This focus area shifts the paradigm by looking at how embodied environmental practices, techno-scientific beings (such as non-humans sharing space with humans), and natural beings in home communities influence the attitude, behaviour and actions of migrant subjects in their host communities. In what ways might the embodied and material environmentalism, which travels with the migrant, help us understand how the migrant subject accepts or rejects their host community? Answering this question could help societies manage tensions arising from border-related transformations.

The third focus area is centred on the ongoing mineral boom in Africa, which, like the oil boom of the 1960s and 1970s, is wrapped in a rhetoric of developmentalism. This rhetoric is privileged over the realities that constitute the negative effects of the mineral boom. These effects include arbitrary and unregulated digging of pits, destruction of water bodies, air pollution, illegal mining and black-market racketeering, child labour, insecurity, and the wiping-out of entire villages where minerals are found. The professorship is interested in historically and theoretically contextualising the conditions of mineral extractions related to the energy transition, but also in the acts of cultural struggle that manifest in the emerging literary, artistic, and filmic works about the underside of the mineral boom in Africa.

Team

Prof. Sule Emmanuel Egya took up the research professorship in mid-April 2026. Tanja Literski joined the team as administrative assistant in July 2026.

Team

Publications

  • 2025
  • #Article
  • #Senior Fellows
  • #peer-reviewed
Kehinde, John OlorunsholaEgya, Sule Emmanuel

Kehinde, John Olorunshola / Egya, Sule Emmanuel

‘Rooted in Earth’: Nature, Traditionalism, and Modernity in Joe Ushie’s A Reign of Locusts.

This study attempts to widen the scope of African ecocriticism and emphasize the roles of nonhuman life forms in literary representations of sustainable environments. Using Joe Ushie’s poetry collection, A Reign of Locusts, for a discourse situated within the African material ecocritical problematic, the study submits that some African poets valorize their birthplaces’ natures not only in recognition of the agency of their places, but also in deployment of traditionalism against the failures of modernity. That is, such African poets often shift from the romanticization of their indigenous ecologies to activism against the force that modernity exerts on the environment. While recognizing the enduring force of modernity, the poets, through their poetics of nature, suggest that the promotion of traditional ways of relating to the earth is one of the ways in which humans can ensure a sustainable environment.

In: Human Ecology Review 28 | 2025 | pp. 55-70

  • #In book
  • #Senior Fellows
Egya, Sule Emmanuel

Egya, Sule Emmanuel

Global South Ambivalence of Transformation? Literature, Extractive Capitalism, and Literary Militancy in West Africa

In: Müller, Simone M. / Schmidt, Matthias / Twelbeck, Kirsten (ed.): Ambivalences of Ecological Transformation: Perspective from the Environmental Humanities | Milton Park: Routledge | 2025 | pp. 143-156

  • 2024
  • #Article
  • #Senior Fellows
  • #peer-reviewed
Egya, Sule Emmanuel

Egya, Sule Emmanuel

Ecology and Decoloniality: Reading the Natural World in Twentieth-Century African Literature

In this article, I argue that pioneer African writing (in the frame of the empire writing back) hinges its anti-colonial aesthetics and politics on what I see as the African natural world—a space of nonhuman–human entanglement ruled by the natural order of things. In confronting colonial discourse, the writers, in most cases, resort to deploying the natures (I prefer the plural form) and the nonhuman elements of their traditional societies, which constitute what many scholars see as the cultural context of their writing in postcolonial reading practice. By way of shifting the paradigm, I propose an ecocentric reading practice that unbundles the notion of cultural context to reveal its heavy reliance on the African natural world. The recourse to natures, I argue, is a decolonial strategy, in that the writers deploy the natural world to counter the Western civilisation imposed on their epistemological order. In the end, the natural world remains the forte of the African writer in presenting a civilisation that claims to be more all-embracing (of humans and their nonhuman others) than the Western one with emphasis on human exceptionalism. I then read Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart and Okot p’Bitek’s Song of Lawino as illustrations of how African writers of the colonial moment anchor their counter-discourse on the African natural world. It is hoped that this reading practice will inspire a revisionist reading of African literature that places indigenous ecology at the centre of decolonial philosophy and practice.

In: Scrutiny2 | 2024 | pp. 9-25